Shadow Government "Money" Supply Growth from ShadowStats

Chart of U.S. Money Supply Growth

27 October, 2010

You Just Can't Make Stuff Like This Up...

From "ProseBeforeHos" (apparently, Marxists don't know how to spell "Pro's", or grasp that "pro's IS hos") http://www.prosebeforehos.com/article-of-the-day/06/29/how-goldman-sachs-took-over-the-american-economy/:

"By now, most of us know the major players. As George Bush’s last Treasury secretary, former Goldman CEO Henry Paulson was the architect of the bailout, a suspiciously self-serving plan to funnel trillions of Your Dollars to a handful of his old friends on Wall Street. Robert Rubin, Bill Clinton’s former Treasury secretary, spent 26 years at Goldman before becoming chairman of Citi-group – which in turn got a $300 billion taxpayer bailout from Paulson. There’s John Thain, the asshole chief of Merrill Lynch who bought an $87,000 area rug for his office as his company was imploding; a former Goldman banker, Thain enjoyed a multibillion-dollar handout from Paulson, who used billions in taxpayer funds to help Bank of America rescue Thain’s sorry company. And Robert Steel, the former Goldmanite head of Wachovia, scored himself and his fellow executives $225 million in golden-parachute payments as his bank was self-destructing. There’s Joshua Bolten, Bush’s chief of staff during the bailout, and Mark Patterson, the current Treasury chief of staff, who was a Goldman lobbyist just a year ago, and Ed Liddy, the former Goldman director whom Paulson put in charge of bailed-out insurance giant AIG, which forked over $13 billion to Goldman after Liddy came on board. The heads of the Canadian and Italian national banks are Goldman alums, as is the head of the World Bank, the head of the New York Stock Exchange. the last two heads of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York – which, incidentally, is now in charge of overseeing Goldman – not to mention…"
Of course, they missed the Goldmanites in the State Department, SEC, CFTC, and everywhere else, but it's an otherwise decent re-write of Matt Taibbi's Rolling Stone article.

Worthy of note: The description of "a pattern that would repeat itself over and over again", e.g., "You take a dollar and borrow nine against it; then you take that $10 fund and borrow $90; then you take your $100 fund and, so long as the public is still lending, borrow and invest $900...".

This is EXACTLY how the Chicago Fed explained fractional reserve banking in its 1992 version of MODERN MONEY MECHANICS. (Available on scribd.com)

No comments:

Post a Comment